fbpx

Foam Rolling – Too Good To Be True?

Foam Rolling – Too Good To Be True?

Worldwide Google searches for “foam roller” spiked in 2015, but the hype never really died down. Today, you will find foam rollers on anywhere from Amazon to sports shops or even your local grocery store. The gym community seems to have a love-hate relationship with them given how painful they are to use sometimes. Foam rollers: reducing DOMS, increasing flexibility, improving your lifts. Are foam rollers too good to be true? 

How Foam Rolling Works

Foam rolling is one example of a “self myofascial release” technique, where the user aims to relax muscle (myo) and fascia(l). There are many theories as to how foam rolling affects the body to create physiological benefits. If you’re not familiar with it; a foam roller is a firm tube covered in varying layers of foam. Using your bodyweight, you roll to massage the target tissue or muscle groups of your choosing. They come in a variety of different shapes, sizes and firmnesses, and some even have a motor that creates vibration. 

The Biology Behind Foam Rolling

Since foam rolling applies pressure to the tissues in your body, one theory is that it can affect fascia – a thin layer of tissue that exists between muscle, bone and other organs or tissues. 

Fascia grows, adapts and repairs itself in a similar way that muscles do, so theoretically we can apply similar principles in training. In our bodies, there are cells called fibroblasts, which play a key role in wound healing and maintaining muscle, fascia, and other tissues. [1] There are also structures called actin, which is also found in muscles – these respond to biomechanical stimulus, such as pressure, and cause tissues to adapt, which includes lengthening of fascia. [2,3] 

Foam rolling can also work to increase the uptake of water into cells, which hydrates the fascia. Although this may temporarily increase stiffness, it increases overall elastic potential and may also allow more optimal sliding between layers of tissue.[4,5] This may explain the improved range of motion that some athletes report as a benefit of foam rolling. 

Is Foam Rolling Good for Pain?

In addition to the fascia and tissues in our bodies moving, our nervous system also plays an important role in the way we perceive sensations, especially pain. Although a study found no difference between the control group and the foam rolling group in terms of self reported pain two days after exercising, a significant improvement was noted in strength performance of rectus femoris, one of the quadriceps muscles. Electromyography activity (electrical signals that muscles use) also suggested improved conductivity and activation in the muscle, but only when foam rolling was done after exercise. It was concluded that foam rolling after exercise could help with neurodynamics, which is the ability for nerves to move and slide within the body. [6]

Another theory is that foam rolling replicates the motions of massage, increasing circulation to muscles and surrounding tissues. In an experiment involving 21 participants, researchers used a doppler ultrasound scanner (like the ones used in heart scanning) to determine factors of arterial blood flow. They compared the lateral thigh at rest, and at post 30 minutes of foam rolling (note: 30 minutes is a long time to be foam rolling one muscle group!). It was found that immediately after foam rolling, lateral thigh muscles had more arterial blood flow. 

Compared to baseline, peak flow increased by 73.6% immediately after rolling, whereas mean average flow improved by 84.4%. This effect lasted for at least 30 minutes, but started to diminish over time – at 30 minutes post rolling peak flow was down to 52.7% and mean average flow was 68.2%. [7] However, blood flow is not a direct indicator of recovery (correlation, not causation)! It may possibly benefit muscles and surrounding tissues with improved supplies of nutrients and removal of waste products, but it may also only be a proxy. We will look at the evidence surrounding foam rolling and improved arterial blood flow make any difference to DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness) later. 

Trigger Points: Can Foam Rolling help?

If you believe in “trigger points”, foam rolling might also be one of the solutions to working out those sensitive spots. Trigger points can be summarised as “hyperirritable spots” within skeletal muscle that cause pain when pressure is applied. [8] In 50 participants that complained of trigger point sensations in the calf, a study compared a placebo with two modes of foam rolling; static release and active rolling. Participants completed 90 seconds of their trial, then researchers pressed on their trigger points with a handheld algometer (an instrument to measure pressure). It was found that participants only had reduced perceived pain in the static release group. [9] 

Current evidence: Is Foam Rolling Evidence Based?

Well, some experiments are more promising while others found no benefits of foam rolling. 

In one experiment, 8 healthy men did 10 sets of 10 back squats (@60% of their 1 rep max) twice, separated by a month. One of which involved 20 minutes of post exercise quadriceps foam rolling immediately, 24 hours and 48 hours after exercising. Researchers found that foam rolling successfully decreased DOMS measured by pressure-pain threshold, and even improved performance in 30 metre sprinting and power (jump distance) after submaximal squatting. [10] 

Krause et al. compared 2 rounds of 60 second stretching to the same amount of foam rolling. They found that in both conditions, participants successfully increased range of motion in knee flexion. However, only the foam rolling condition improved the perception of stretch and modified the sliding between deep and superficial fascial layers. This was a crossover study, meaning that the same 16 participants did both static stretching and foam rolling, but with some time in between. [11] In hip flexion, similar results have been found. A similar experimental protocol found that both isolated groups (static stretching/foam rolling), resulted in an increase in passive range of motion in hip flexion. However, static stretching combined with foam rolling produced the most pronounced effect. [12] 

Overall evidence for benefits of foam rolling, however, has been controversial. Whilst the aforementioned studies suggest that foam rolling could result in meaningful physiological benefits, others have found that foam rolling does not significantly improve performance or recovery. For example, in middle distance running, foam rolling in 16 trained male runners produced no difference in performance. The protocol was that they ran 800m, either rested passively for 15 minutes or foam rolled for 10 minutes between passive rest (10+5 minute), and then ran another 800m. Researchers found no significant differences between the conditions in measured CO2, stride length, run time, and hip extension. [13] However, considering that these young men were elite athletes and already had above average recovery to begin with, this may explain why foam rolling did not make much of a difference. 

A meta-analysis of 21 studies described effects of foam rolling as “rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases”. Foam rolling did produce acute benefits on range of motion, but no benefits of other athletic markers (such as muscle strength, muscle activation, maximal oxygen uptake, speed, agility or acceleration) were found. [14] 

Similarly, in a systematic review and meta-analysis published recently, researchers looked at 32 studies involving foam rolling in athletes. They found no benefits to athletic performance apart from improving range of motion, but also no detrimental effects. However, this only involved lab experiments, so practically, effects of foam rolling could translate better in everyday training or even competition. [15] Both noted that most randomised control trials on foam rolling have been done using male participants, but the effects seem to apply equally to male and female participants. The consensus in the community is that more research needs to be conducted to find out more about concrete benefits of foam rolling beyond improving range of motion. 

Future research

There is also a lot of controversy around “optimal foam rolling” – does such a thing exist or is it only a concept? Protocols of foam rolling have varied widely between experiments, with some finding benefits from just 2×60 seconds of foam rolling, to rolling for half an hour. How long should you foam roll for to get the most “bang for your buck”? Does more necessarily mean better? We simply don’t know yet. Until the evidence is clear, we would suggest you start with 2×60 seconds of foam rolling and work your way up weekly to find out where you experience the most benefit. 

Are there more benefits if you use a patterned foam roller to target trigger points, or even ones that vibrate? A recent study compared the use of a conventional foam roller or one that vibrated. In 45 recreationally active adults, participants reported significant improvement in pain threshold of the quadriceps after using the vibrating foam roller compared to the conventional foam roller. However, no difference in knee range of motion was found between the two foam rolling groups. [16] 

Does foam rolling help specific muscles? 

Is foam rolling more effective in some muscle groups than others? Most research has focused on rolling the lower limb, especially the effect on the quads, calves, and hips. Do any particular muscles benefit from foam rolling more than others? Similarly, will some modes of sports or training benefit more from foam rolling? 

Finally, should foam rolling be done before exercise as part of your warm up or after exercise as part of your cool down? Currently, evidence leans more towards rolling before exercise, but given that there are mixed conclusions from research, the jury is still out on this. 

So, should you use a foam roller? 

With some studies quoting improvements whilst others finding that foam rolling is no better than passive resting groups, is there any point in your self-inflicted agony? Foam rolling will probably do no harm to your gains and lifts in the gym. Some of you may still swear by them and some of you might just reconsider whether it’s worth your time. 

Since research into mechanisms and benefits is still being conducted, and there is no gold standard about duration of rolling, material of the roller or whether it is more beneficial to roll before or after your workout, you may want to wait until a conclusion has been made. 

However, this shouldn’t discount the benefits of what you might feel. Those few degrees of increased range of motion might just mean that you hit your PBs next time! 

Summary: 

● Theoretical mechanisms of foam rolling include improving: fascial elasticity and 

mobility, neurodynamic mobility, arterial blood flow to muscles and surrounding 

tissues, and releases myofascial trigger points. 

● Current research has been focused around whether foam rolling is effective for 

improving DOMS, pain tolerance, flexibility, and athletic markers. Findings have 

been mixed for these areas. 

● Foam rolling improving range of motion is one of the only areas that research has 

consistently supported. 

● We don’t know whether there is an optimal way to foam roll – duration, build of 

roller, timing are some of the areas to be explored in future research. 

● Although foam rolling might not be as effective as it has been hyped up, there may 

still be benefits of using a foam roller for recovery and performance – use one if you 

personally feel like it is helpful to you! 

Article written by Elizabeth An Yu Wong

References
[1] R. McAnulty, “Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts: Their source, function and role in disease”, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 666-671, 2007. Available: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.11.005. [2] H. Langevin, M. Nedergaard and A. Howe, “Cellular control of connective tissue matrix tension”, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1714-1719, 2013. Available: 10.1002/jcb.24521. [3] Y. Ujihara, M. Nakamura, H. Miyazaki and S. Wada, “Contribution of actin filaments to the global compressive properties of fibroblasts”, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 14, pp. 192-198, 2012. Available: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.05.006 [Accessed 1 August 2020]. [4] R. Schleip and D. Müller, “Training principles for fascial connective tissues: Scientific foundation and suggested practical applications”, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 103-115, 2013. Available: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.06.007. [5] R. Schleip et al., “Strain hardening of fascia: Static stretching of dense fibrous connective tissues can induce a temporary stiffness increase accompanied by enhanced matrix hydration”, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 94-100, 2012. Available: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.09.003. [6] B. Romero-Moraleda et al., “Neurodynamic mobilization and foam rolling improved delayed-onset muscle soreness in a healthy adult population: a randomized controlled clinical trial”, PeerJ, vol. 5, p. e3908, 2017. Available: 10.7717/peerj.3908. [7] T. Hotfiel et al., “Acute Effects of Lateral Thigh Foam Rolling on Arterial Tissue Perfusion Determined by Spectral Doppler and Power Doppler Ultrasound”, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 893-900, 2017. Available: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001641. [8] E. Lavelle, W. Lavelle and H. Smith, “Myofascial Trigger Points”, Anesthesiology Clinics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 841-851, 2007. Available: 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.07.003. [9] J. Wilke, L. Vogt and W. Banzer, “Immediate effects of self-myofascial release on latent trigger point sensitivity: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial”, Biology of Sport, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 349-354, 2018. Available: 10.5114/biolsport.2018.78055. [10] G. Pearcey, D. Bradbury-Squires, J. Kawamoto, E. Drinkwater, D. Behm and D. Button, “Foam Rolling for Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness and Recovery of Dynamic Performance Measures”, Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 5-13, 2015. Available: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.01. [11] F. Krause, J. Wilke, D. Niederer, L. Vogt and W. Banzer, “Acute effects of foam rolling on passive stiffness, stretch sensation and fascial sliding: A randomized controlled trial”, Human Movement Science, vol. 67, p. 102514, 2019. Available: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102514. [12] A. Mohr, B. Long and C. Goad, “Effect of Foam Rolling and Static Stretching on Passive Hip-Flexion Range of Motion”, Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 296-299, 2014. Available: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0025. [13] A. D’Amico and V. Paolone, “The Effect of Foam Rolling on Recovery Between Two Eight Hundred Metre Runs”, Journal of Human Kinetics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 97-105, 2017. Available: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0051. [14] T. Wiewelhove et al., “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery”, Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 10, 2019. Available: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00376. [15] B. Skinner, R. Moss and L. Hammond, “A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on range of motion, recovery and markers of athletic performance”, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 105-122, 2020. Available: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.01.007. [16] S. Cheatham, K. Stull and M. Kolber, “Comparison of a Vibration Roller and a Nonvibration Roller Intervention on Knee Range of Motion and Pressure Pain Threshold: A Randomized Controlled Trial”, Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 39-45, 2019. Available: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0164.

Psssst… Hey, you! Here’s a question for you: Do you have a workout plan?

Check out our most popular workouts programs to start building muscle now. 

Stay Updated

With the latest science updates. We don’t spam! 

By clicking on subscribe you agree to our Privacy PolicyTerms & Condititions

Injury football player laying down
Build Muscle

How to prevent injury

You’ve probably heard that training too much can get you injured. You’ve probably also heard that training too little makes you weaker and more likely

Read More »
×
×

Cart