Conventional bro science says that narrow stance squats result in higher activation of the quadriceps (knee dominance), while a wider stance is primarily a posterior chain movement (hip dominance). However, this hypothesis might not be as accurate as old bro-wisdom states. Escamilla’s (2001) study on powerlifters compared three different stances (narrow, medium, and wide stance) and found that wide stance squats had higher knee dominance when compared to narrow stance and medium stance (!).

Does this mean that wide stance is the complete opposite of what it was once thought of?
Well, not so fast.

On the flipside, studies comparing stances using EMG (2, 3, 4) found no significant differences in in quad activation. Two of the studies found a slight increase in glute activation with the wide stance variations. But as we’ve written before, EMG is not a reliable way to measure the degree of muscle activation.

In sum, there is likely not enough evidence to equivocally conclude that one stance is superior to another in terms of quad activation. Nevertheless, we can conclude that the notion of wide stance being hip dominant and narrow being knee dominant movements is most likely incorrect. A piece of advice to follow is that the stance that gives you the greatest range of motion is likely the best the best for building quads.

Sources:

1. Escamilla R. et al. (2001). A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, 6, 984-998.

2. Paoli A. et al. (2009). The Effect of Stance Width on the Electromyographical Activity of Eight Superficial Thigh Muscles During Back Squat With Different Bar Loads. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23, 1, 246-250.

3. Escamilla, R et al. (2001). Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, 1552-1566.

4. McCaw T et al. (1999). Stance width and bar load effects on leg muscle activity during the parallel squat. MSSE. 31, 3, 428-36.

 

Content provided by @ironorestrength, team EBT member, M.Sc. Psychology and licenced personal trainer.


0 thoughts on “Narrow stance squats do not mean more quadriceps activation”

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Burn fat

For fat loss, fat storage needs to be slower than fat oxidation!

Many “fat burners” and other products claim to increase fat oxidation to help you lose fat. While it may be true that there is evidence that the “fat burner” in question could increase your fat Read more...

Full Archive

HOW TO USE SLEEP TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS

Do you think yourself as a person that don’t need that much sleep and that maybe pride yourself in how well you function with a bit less sleep than the average joe? Even if you Read more...

Burn fat

Stop focusing on macros, start focusing on food quality

Stop focusing on macros, start focusing on food quality “You should eat more protein”. “Stay away from carbs”. We’ve all heard it. How much truth is there to these claims? Well it all depends on your Read more...